Latvian Economy Accelerates in H1 2026 as Manufacturing and Consumer Demand Strengthen

Latvia’s economy strengthened during the first half of 2026, with growth spreading across manufacturing, retail, services and building activity. GDP increased by 2.8% compared with the first six months of 2025, putting the economy on a considerably stronger trajectory than anticipated by forecasts produced earlier in the year. Inflation and labour-market constraints remained challenges, while imports continued to increase faster than exports. Economic activity accelerated during the second quarter, when GDP was 3.0% higher than a year earlier and increased by 0.7% from Q1 after seasonal and calendar adjustments. Total value added grew by 3.4% year-on-year, with production-related industries increasing by 3.3% and services by 3.5%.

Manufacturing was among the stronger contributors, expanding by 5.5% during Q2. Information and communication activities increased by 8.3%, while financial and insurance services grew by 10.4%. Trade also performed strongly, with retail activity increasing by 5.8% and wholesale by 7.4%. Household spending showed signs of improvement, with retail sales volumes in June 4.8% higher than a year earlier. Food retail increased by 4.6%, non-food sales excluding automotive fuel by 5.9% and fuel retail by 2.4%. Internet and mail-order sales recorded particularly strong growth, increasing by 18.6% compared with June 2025.

The manufacturing recovery remained uneven between industries. Overall manufacturing production was 5.0% higher in June than a year earlier. Food manufacturing increased by 5.7%, fabricated-metal production by 19.0% and computer, electronic and optical manufacturing by 17.3%, while chemical manufacturing also recorded substantial growth. Other industries were less supportive. Wood-product manufacturing, an important part of Latvia’s industrial economy, declined by 1.1% compared with June 2025, while beverage, vehicle and paper manufacturing also contracted. Overall industrial production increased by only 0.5% year-on-year because weaker electricity and gas output offset much of the expansion in manufacturing, and production was 0.8% lower than in May.

Construction presented a more positive picture during Q2. Overall activity increased by 3.2% compared with a year earlier, driven primarily by a 12.6% increase in building construction. Civil engineering declined by 3.2%, while road and railway construction was 9.5% lower. The figures point to a significant difference between stronger building development and weaker infrastructure-related activity.

Foreign trade expanded during the first six months. Latvia exported goods worth approximately €10.43 billion, 5.8% more than during H1 2025, while imports increased by 8.0% to around €12.39 billion. Total goods trade consequently reached approximately €22.81 billion, representing growth of 7.0% compared with a year earlier. June was particularly strong for exports, with goods exports reaching approximately €1.70 billion, an increase of 18.6% compared with June 2025, while imports rose by 14.1% to around €2.17 billion. After adjustment for seasonal and calendar differences, exports were 14.5% higher and imports 9.3% higher than a year earlier. Machinery and electrical equipment, mineral products, vehicles, food products and metals were among the categories contributing to export growth.

Imports nevertheless grew faster than exports across the first half, resulting in a goods-trade deficit of approximately €1.96 billion. Part of the increase in imports may reflect stronger domestic consumption and investment, but the widening gap between imports and exports remains an important consideration for Latvia’s external position.

The labour market was relatively stable but did not strengthen at the same pace as economic output. Around 885,500 people aged 15 to 74 were employed during Q2, equivalent to 65.1% of that age group. Employment increased by approximately 14,300 compared with Q1 but remained around 3,800 below its level a year earlier. Unemployment stood at 7.0%, compared with 6.7% during Q2 2025. This difference between stronger economic growth and relatively stable employment highlights Latvia’s continuing demographic and labour-supply challenges, particularly for businesses requiring specialised technical skills.

Inflation remained another constraint. Consumer prices were 3.4% higher in June than a year earlier and unchanged compared with May. Food and non-alcoholic beverage prices were 0.9% lower year-on-year, but housing, utilities and energy costs increased by 7.2%, transport prices by 7.1% and restaurant and accommodation services by 7.9%. Compared with the average price level during 2025, consumer prices in June were 3.8% higher, with goods increasing by 2.8% and services by 6.4%. Improving economic activity has therefore been accompanied by continued pressure on household and business costs, particularly for services and energy-related expenditure.

For Latvia’s property market, the stronger first-half economy provides a more supportive environment than during the preceding period of weak growth. Improving retail activity benefits shopping centres, retail parks and other consumer-facing property, while the rapid expansion of online sales adds to the importance of distribution and fulfilment facilities. Stronger manufacturing also improves the backdrop for industrial and logistics property, particularly where demand is connected with food production, metals, electronics and machinery. The variation between manufacturing industries nevertheless means occupier demand is unlikely to strengthen uniformly across every industrial location.

The increase in building construction is another positive indicator for property development. Activity improved considerably during Q2 even as civil engineering remained weaker. Riga and its surrounding municipalities remain particularly important to determining whether stronger economic conditions translate into sustained demand for modern offices, logistics facilities, housing and other commercial development.

Latvijas Banka’s June projections were prepared before the full strength of the second-quarter economy became apparent. The central bank expects inflation of approximately 3.6% during 2026 and continues to identify geopolitical developments, energy costs and the external economic environment as important risks to Latvia’s outlook. The European Commission’s spring forecast also predates the latest H1 figures. It anticipated GDP growth of 1.4% during 2026 and 1.6% in 2027, considerably below the 2.8% year-on-year increase already recorded during the first half. The Commission expects inflation to average around 3.6% this year before declining to 2.2% in 2027.

Public finances present another challenge. The European Commission expects Latvia’s government deficit to increase from 2.5% of GDP in 2025 to approximately 3.3% in 2026. Public debt is forecast to rise from 46.9% of GDP to around 48.8% this year and 53.8% in 2027. At the same time, higher defence expenditure and European funding are creating additional investment across infrastructure and industry. Latvia’s position on NATO’s eastern border has increased spending on defence capabilities and related infrastructure, potentially creating opportunities for construction, industrial development and supporting services while also adding pressure to government expenditure.

Latvia entered the second half of 2026 with stronger momentum than expected at the beginning of the year. GDP growth accelerated, manufacturing improved, consumer activity strengthened and building construction expanded. The recovery nevertheless remains exposed to higher costs, labour constraints, geopolitical uncertainty and an external trade position in which imports are growing faster than exports. For the property market, the stronger economy improves the outlook for selected retail, industrial, logistics and development activity. Whether this develops into a broader real estate recovery will depend on the durability of domestic demand, continued manufacturing growth and Latvia’s ability to convert public, European and private investment into sustained economic activity.

Source: CIJ.World Research & Analysis Team

Italian Economy Records Modest Growth in H1 2026 as Employment and Exports Strengthen

Italy recorded further economic growth during the first half of 2026, although the expansion remained modest. Rising employment, a growing services sector and stronger exports provided support, while consumer activity remained relatively resilient. Manufacturing produced a less consistent performance, residential development remained subdued and higher energy costs contributed to renewed inflationary pressure. GDP increased by 0.2% during the second quarter compared with the previous three months and was 1.0% higher than in Q2 2025. The result followed growth earlier in the year and left Italy with positive momentum entering the second half, although the overall pace of expansion remained limited.

Services were the strongest part of the economy during Q2, increasing by 0.4% from the previous quarter. Industry declined by 0.5%, while agriculture was 0.2% lower. Domestic demand also contributed to growth, with household and public consumption together increasing by 0.3% from the previous quarter and fixed investment rising by the same amount. Foreign trade reduced quarterly GDP growth because imports increased by 1.7%, compared with a 0.8% rise in exports. The figures show an economy increasingly dependent on services and domestic demand while industrial activity continues to encounter more difficult conditions.

Industrial activity remained uneven. Production declined by 1.0% in June compared with May and was 0.6% lower than a year earlier after adjustment for differences in working days. Across the second quarter as a whole, however, industrial production increased by 0.4% compared with Q1. Italian manufacturers continue to operate against a difficult international backdrop, with competition from overseas producers, changes in global trade and accumulated increases in operating costs affecting different industries to varying degrees. These pressures are particularly relevant for manufacturers with high energy requirements and businesses exposed to international price competition.

Consumer activity was more resilient. Retail sales increased by 0.6% in value and 0.2% in volume during Q2 compared with the previous quarter. In June, sales were 3.1% higher in value and 1.9% higher in volume than a year earlier. Non-food retail performed particularly strongly, with volumes increasing by 3.1%, while food sales volumes were unchanged. Changes in shopping habits continue to influence the retail sector alongside the wider economic cycle, requiring conventional retailers and shopping destinations to compete increasingly on convenience, experience and the integration of stores with digital distribution.

Employment was one of the strongest elements of Italy’s first-half performance. The number of people in work increased by approximately 155,000 between Q1 and Q2 to around 24.36 million. The employment rate reached 63.1%, while unemployment stood at 5.6%. Compared with the second quarter of 2025, employment increased by approximately 246,000 people, equivalent to around 1.0%. Permanent employment and self-employment increased, while temporary employment declined slightly. The number of unemployed people was almost 10% lower than a year earlier and total hours worked also increased. The combination of rising employment and modest GDP growth keeps productivity performance an important issue for Italy’s medium-term economic outlook.

Inflation increased during the first half, largely because of energy. Consumer prices were 3.0% higher in June than a year earlier, easing from 3.2% in May. Inflation excluding energy and fresh food was considerably lower at 1.6%, showing that the acceleration in headline prices was concentrated in particular parts of household expenditure rather than being equally distributed across the economy. Energy prices increased considerably faster than the overall consumer-price index, while unprocessed food also remained more expensive than a year earlier. Higher energy costs therefore represent an important risk for both households and companies if they persist into the second half.

Foreign trade remained an important source of support. Italian exports increased by 4.5% in value during the first six months compared with H1 2025, while imports rose by 4.3%. Italy generated a trade surplus of approximately €24.5 billion during the period, compared with around €22.8 billion a year earlier. June produced particularly strong export figures, with values increasing by 9.8% and volumes by 5.1% compared with June 2025. Part of the increase was associated with unusually large shipbuilding transactions, meaning the headline annual increase was stronger than the underlying trend. Nevertheless, exports remained clearly above their level a year earlier even after allowing for this effect.

Construction and development indicators presented a mixed picture. Residential development remained restrained, with the number of dwellings authorised in new buildings during the first quarter declining by 9.2% from the previous quarter and by 0.5% compared with a year earlier. The picture for non-residential development was stronger, with authorised floor area increasing by 2.6% from the previous quarter and by 12.5% compared with Q1 2025. While one quarter does not establish a lasting trend, the figures indicate greater activity in parts of the commercial and industrial development pipeline than in new residential construction.

Investment supported by Italy’s European recovery programme remains important to the wider economy. Infrastructure, public works and modernisation projects are contributing to activity at a time when private-sector growth remains restrained. As the programme advances, the ability to convert allocated funding into completed projects will become increasingly important for economic performance. Banca d’Italia expects growth to remain modest, with its June projections anticipating GDP growth of around 0.5% during 2026 on a calendar-adjusted basis. Average inflation is expected to be around 3.1% this year before moving closer to 2% during the following two years.

The European Commission presents a similar growth outlook, expecting GDP to increase by 0.5% during 2026 and 0.6% in 2027. It forecasts inflation of 3.2% this year before a decline to 1.8% in 2027, while unemployment is expected to remain close to 5.7%. Public finances continue to constrain Italy’s economic options. The Commission expects the government deficit to decline from 3.1% of GDP in 2025 to approximately 2.9% this year. Public debt, however, is projected to increase from 137.1% of GDP in 2025 to around 138.5% in 2026 and 139.2% in 2027.

For Italy’s commercial property sector, the first-half economic environment provides different signals depending on the asset class and location. Rising employment and relatively resilient consumer activity provide support for retail, hospitality and other properties linked to household spending. Continued services growth also creates a more supportive environment for modern office space in the country’s strongest business centres. Industrial and logistics property faces a more varied backdrop. Export growth, infrastructure investment and manufacturing projects continue to create opportunities, but weak industrial production means demand is unlikely to develop evenly across the country. Major ports, transport corridors and established manufacturing clusters are likely to remain particularly important to the sector.

The increase in authorised non-residential development also indicates continued developer activity despite Italy’s low national growth rate. Residential construction remains more constrained, reinforcing supply pressures in cities and regions where employment, education and population movements continue to generate housing demand. Italy entered the second half of 2026 with an economy that is still expanding but at a restrained pace. Employment, services and exports were among the stronger elements during H1, while manufacturing remained inconsistent and residential development subdued. Higher energy costs have also complicated the inflation outlook. The challenge for the remainder of the year will be turning investment, employment and external demand into broader and more durable economic growth.

Source: CIJ.World Research & Analysis Team

Ljubljana’s Commercial Core Expands Around Emonika

Ljubljana’s main railway station is becoming one of the most important development areas in the Slovenian capital as construction of Emonika brings a large concentration of offices, housing, hotels and retail space into an area that has remained relatively underdeveloped despite its central location. Rather than creating an entirely separate business district, Emonika could extend Ljubljana’s existing commercial core around its principal transport hub. The scale of the development, combined with improvements to the surrounding transport infrastructure, raises a wider property-market question: whether investment in one major project can change occupier demand, development activity and ultimately property values across the surrounding neighbourhood.

Construction is progressing on both the northern and southern parts of Emonika. The southern section includes a 100-metre, 23-storey office tower, more than 22,000 sqm of shopping and leisure space, a hotel and four underground parking levels. STRABAG’s construction contract for this part of the project is worth approximately €134 million. Development on the northern side combines another office building with three residential buildings containing 187 apartments, hotel accommodation, commercial space and underground parking. STRABAG’s construction contracts covering the northern and southern sections together amount to approximately €230 million.

Across the development, Emonika is expected to provide around 100,000 sqm of mixed-use space. Approximately 35,500 sqm will be dedicated to workplaces and about 22,300 sqm to shopping and leisure, alongside 187 apartments, around 380 hotel rooms and approximately 1,500 parking spaces. The combination makes Emonika one of the most substantial mixed-use developments currently changing Ljubljana’s property market.

The hospitality component became clearer during the second quarter of 2026. Agreements announced in May will bring two international hotel brands to the project. A four-star TRIBE hotel is planned for the northern section and will be operated by Mogotel Hotel Group, while a five-star Eurostars property is planned for the southern part.

The combination of uses is important because Emonika is not dependent on a single property sector. Offices will bring employees into the area, hotels will generate visitor demand, apartments will create a permanent residential population and retail and leisure facilities should attract customers throughout the day and evening. This gives the development the potential to establish a more active urban district around Ljubljana’s main transport interchange.

The office component is also entering a market experiencing a significant development cycle. More than 80,000 sqm of new office accommodation is being developed across Ljubljana, with Emonika representing an important part of that pipeline. Demand has increasingly focused on newer, higher-quality workplaces, making the performance of the station district particularly relevant for future development decisions.

Emonika will also represent a sizeable addition to Ljubljana’s retail market. More than 22,000 sqm of shopping and leisure accommodation will introduce a significant concentration of modern commercial space into the city centre rather than one of Ljubljana’s established peripheral shopping destinations.

The greater property opportunity, however, could emerge outside Emonika itself. Large mixed-use projects can change how investors and occupiers perceive surrounding streets, particularly when development is combined with investment in transport infrastructure. Properties that previously benefited from a central location but lacked a strong commercial environment could become more attractive for refurbishment or redevelopment as activity around the station increases.

Whether this translates into higher property values has yet to be established. There is not enough transactional evidence to conclude that neighbouring properties have already been repriced because of Emonika. The development nevertheless creates conditions that could encourage owners and investors to reassess sites around the station as completion approaches.

Office leasing will provide one of the clearest tests. If businesses are willing to establish significant operations at Emonika and the development achieves competitive rental levels, neighbouring office projects could become easier to justify. Residential performance will provide another indicator if the new apartments establish stronger pricing or rental benchmarks for the surrounding district.

Hotels provide an additional measure of confidence in the location. The commitment of international hospitality operators suggests expectations of increased business and visitor activity around the transport hub. Their eventual performance could influence whether additional hotel or serviced accommodation projects become viable nearby.

The station area’s evolution also needs to be considered within Ljubljana’s relatively compact urban structure. Emonika is unlikely to replace established commercial locations elsewhere in the city. Instead, it could strengthen and enlarge the existing centre by connecting more commercial activity directly with the railway and bus infrastructure.

For investors, the opportunity therefore may not be a wholesale relocation of Ljubljana’s business district, but an expansion of the area capable of supporting prime offices, hotels, housing and retail. The most revealing evidence will eventually come from what happens around Emonika: transactions involving neighbouring buildings, redevelopment proposals, office leasing, residential pricing and new investment decisions.

Emonika is already changing the physical scale of development around Ljubljana station. If it also encourages investment in surrounding properties, its most significant long-term effect could extend well beyond its own buildings, helping expand Ljubljana’s commercial core around the city’s principal transport gateway.

Source: CIJ.World Research & Analysis Team

Russian Strikes Near Poland Put NATO Preparedness Under Closer Scrutiny

Russian attacks on transport infrastructure in western Ukraine have moved within kilometres of Poland, increasing security concerns along NATO’s eastern frontier and renewing debate over how Warsaw and its allies should respond without allowing military rhetoric to run ahead of events.

A Russian drone struck the locomotive of a passenger train at Yahodyn in western Ukraine on 13 September, around two kilometres from Polish territory. Passengers were evacuated and no casualties were reported. In a separate incident nearby, another Russian drone hit a truck close to Poland, temporarily disrupting operations at the Yahodyn-Dorohusk border crossing. Russia said its operations were directed against railway infrastructure involved in transporting military cargo from European countries.

The railway attack attracted additional attention because another train carrying former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, former Swedish Prime Minister Carl Bildt and European security advisers had travelled through Yahodyn shortly beforehand. Ukraine’s state railway operator suggested that the diplomatic train could have been the intended target, although this has not been independently established. Former CIA director David Petraeus was aboard another train at the station when the drone struck.

The incidents underline the strategic importance of western Ukraine’s connections with Poland. Border crossings, railways and roads in the region provide important routes for humanitarian assistance and military equipment entering Ukraine from its Western partners. This makes transport infrastructure close to NATO territory increasingly exposed as Russia attempts to disrupt Ukraine’s supply network.

For Poland, the distinction between proximity and direct attack remains essential. The locomotive was struck inside Ukraine, not on Polish territory, and the incident was therefore not an attack against NATO. Nevertheless, repeated Russian military activity so close to the frontier increases the possibility of accidents, miscalculation and further escalation.

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk responded by bringing senior government and security officials together to assess the situation. Warsaw has become increasingly concerned that Russian military and hybrid activity could create more direct security problems for Poland as the war continues close to its borders.

Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski has adopted a more assertive position. He has argued that NATO possesses a major advantage over Russia in air power and suggested that the alliance could defeat Russia relatively quickly in the event of a direct attack. He has also argued that European military capabilities would remain substantial even without full American involvement. These are strategic assessments rather than established predictions about how a future conflict would develop.

Europe has a much larger economic base than Russia and possesses sophisticated military technology, but economic scale and equipment numbers alone do not determine the ability to sustain a prolonged conflict. Ammunition production, logistics, air defence, intelligence, industrial capacity and political willingness would all become critical in a major confrontation.

For Poland, practical preparedness is therefore more important than predictions about how quickly Russia might be defeated. Investment in air and missile defence, surveillance, ammunition, military mobility and resilient transport and energy infrastructure strengthens deterrence while reducing the risks created by a war taking place immediately beyond the country’s eastern border.

Russia should neither be portrayed as an unstoppable military power nor treated as an opponent Europe could overcome without substantial costs. The more important objective is to ensure that Moscow sees any direct attack against NATO territory as carrying military, economic and political consequences far greater than any potential gain.

The strikes around Yahodyn demonstrate how physically close the war has moved to NATO territory. They do not mean that Russia and NATO are at war, but they reinforce the need for European governments to prepare for possible escalation without presenting such an outcome as inevitable.

For Poland in particular, credible deterrence will ultimately depend less on declarations about what NATO could do to Russia and more on demonstrating what Russia would encounter if it crossed the alliance’s border: prepared armed forces, protected infrastructure, adequate military supplies and allies capable of responding together.

Source: WEI

Hungarian Economy Returns to Growth in H1 2026 as Consumption Strengthens

Hungary’s economy returned to firmer growth during the first half of 2026, supported by stronger household spending, expanding services and an improvement in industrial activity. Inflation fell substantially, helping restore consumer purchasing power, but investment and construction remained weak and the labour market showed some signs of softening. GDP increased by 1.7% during the first six months compared with H1 2025. The economy expanded by 0.8% during the first quarter compared with the final three months of 2025 and by a further 0.5% in Q2. Compared with a year earlier, GDP was 1.7% higher during both quarters, confirming that economic activity had strengthened following an extended period of weak performance.

Services provided the largest contribution to second-quarter growth. Activity across the sector increased by 1.9% year-on-year and contributed around 1.1 percentage points to the overall increase in GDP. Industry also improved, expanding by 3.7%, while manufacturing output was 2.7% higher than a year earlier. Agriculture moved sharply in the opposite direction, declining by 12.4%, while construction was 0.3% lower. Household demand became an increasingly important source of growth during H1, as lower inflation allowed improvements in income to translate more directly into purchasing power after several years in which rapidly rising prices placed substantial pressure on household budgets.

Retail figures reflected this improvement. Sales volumes increased by 4.5% during January-June compared with the first half of 2025. In June alone, calendar-adjusted retail sales were 3.0% higher year-on-year. Non-food sales increased by 5.1% and food retail by 1.8%, while automotive-fuel sales declined slightly. Industry also recorded a stronger first-half performance, with production increasing by 2.4% between January and June compared with H1 2025. Export sales from industry increased by 2.8%, while domestic industrial sales declined by 2.5%, illustrating the continuing importance of international demand to Hungarian manufacturing.

June industrial production was 10.1% higher than a year earlier before adjustment for working days. Once the difference in working days was taken into account, growth was 4.1%. Production nevertheless declined by 1.4% compared with May, demonstrating that the industrial recovery remained uneven from month to month. Several manufacturing segments performed more strongly during the first half. Transport-equipment production increased by 3.8%, while computer, electronic and optical manufacturing recorded considerably stronger expansion. Manufacturing order books were also higher at the end of June than a year earlier, providing a more supportive starting point for activity during the second half.

Investment remained one of the weakest parts of the economy. Gross fixed capital formation was 4.8% lower in Q2 than a year earlier, showing that stronger consumption, services and industrial activity had not yet developed into a broad recovery in capital expenditure. Construction presented a similarly difficult picture. Output across the first six months was 0.7% below its level in H1 2025. In June, construction activity declined by 1.2% year-on-year before adjustment and by 3.9% compared with May. Building construction was 5.5% lower than a year earlier, while civil engineering increased by 5.6%. The future development pipeline also showed signs of weakness, with new construction contracts signed during June substantially below their level a year earlier and the total stock of outstanding contracts slightly lower than in June 2025.

Housing development provided a more positive signal. Hungary completed 6,278 new dwellings during the first six months of 2026, 22% more than during H1 2025. Building permits and simplified declarations covered 16,588 planned homes, representing an increase of 29%. Budapest accounted for 2,224 completed dwellings during the first half, also 22% more than a year earlier. Residential development in the capital remained highly concentrated, however, with a relatively small number of districts responsible for the majority of new housing completions.

Inflation declined considerably during the first half and became an important source of support for household purchasing power. Consumer prices were 1.7% higher in June than a year earlier and were unchanged compared with May. Price developments varied considerably between different categories. Food prices increased by only 0.2% year-on-year in June, while services were 4.0% more expensive. The difference indicates that Hungary’s earlier inflation shock has eased substantially, although price pressure remains present in parts of the domestic economy.

The labour market remained relatively tight but weakened slightly. Average employment during April-June stood at approximately 4.63 million people, around 28,000 fewer than during the corresponding period of 2025. The employment rate among people aged between 15 and 64 nevertheless remained around 75%. Approximately 214,000 people were unemployed in June, producing an unemployment rate of 4.4%. Hungary therefore continued to maintain relatively low unemployment despite modestly lower employment and ongoing restructuring within parts of industry.

Foreign trade remained another important component of the economy. Hungary exported goods worth approximately €14.9 billion in June and imported around €13.6 billion, resulting in a monthly trade surplus of approximately €1.3 billion. Export volumes increased more strongly than imports compared with a year earlier, although differences in working days influenced the annual comparison. The combination of stronger industrial exports and weak capital formation highlights the unusual balance within Hungary’s current economic recovery. The country has attracted substantial automotive, battery, electronics and related manufacturing investment in recent years, and the wider economic impact will increasingly depend on new capacity progressing into sustained production and exports.

The Hungarian National Bank expects GDP to increase by approximately 2.0% across 2026 before growth accelerates to around 3.0% in 2027. Its June outlook anticipates average inflation of approximately 1.8% this year. The European Commission’s earlier assessment is slightly more cautious, projecting GDP growth of approximately 1.8% during 2026 and 2.1% in 2027. Its forecast puts average inflation at 3.2% this year, with the difference partly reflecting the timing and assumptions underlying the respective projections.

Public finances remain a significant risk to the outlook. The European Commission expects Hungary’s government deficit to reach approximately 6.2% of GDP during 2026, compared with 4.7% in 2025. Public debt is forecast to increase to around 75.1% of GDP this year and 76.8% in 2027. For Hungary’s commercial property sector, the first-half economic environment has improved but remains mixed. Stronger household spending provides a better backdrop for retail property, while recovering industrial production and exports support manufacturing and logistics activity. Increased housing completions and permits also point towards renewed activity in parts of the residential market.

Weak capital formation and construction remain important constraints. Businesses are still cautious about committing to investment, while weaker construction contracts could translate into a thinner development pipeline if current conditions persist. This creates a market in which demand may improve before development activity fully recovers. Hungary entered the second half of 2026 with growth more firmly established than during the preceding period of stagnation. Household spending has strengthened, services are expanding, industry has improved and inflation has fallen substantially. Investment, construction and public finances remain the principal weaknesses. The durability of the recovery will depend on whether stronger consumption and industrial activity can eventually encourage renewed private investment and whether Hungary’s substantial manufacturing capacity translates into sustained production and exports.

Source: CIJ.World Research & Analysis Team

UNIQA Real Estate Expands Beyond Group Capital with New Institutional Investment Business

UNIQA Real Estate Management is opening its property investment platform to outside investors, marking a shift from managing real estate primarily for UNIQA Group to also handling capital from international institutions and large family offices. Germany and Austria will provide the initial focus for attracting investors.

The Vienna-based company currently manages approximately €3 billion of real estate assets and has around five decades of experience in the sector. Under the expanded strategy, external investors will be able to participate through investment funds, dedicated mandates and transactions involving groups of investors, depending on their capital requirements and investment objectives.

The new activity will use the same investment and property management infrastructure that UNIQA Real Estate has developed for the insurance group’s portfolio. The company covers both strategic investment decisions and the ongoing management of assets, allowing it to oversee properties through different stages of ownership.

UNIQA Real Estate’s existing portfolio comprises more than 200 properties with over one million sqm of leasable space. It includes offices, retail properties, hotels and residential assets, ranging from historic buildings in Vienna to modern commercial developments.

Geographically, the portfolio is concentrated in Austria and several Central and Eastern European markets. UNIQA Real Estate currently has property exposure in Czechia, Slovakia, Hungary, Poland and Romania, providing the new external investment business with an established presence across some of CEE’s principal real estate markets.

Thomas Erdmann, Managing Director of UNIQA Real Estate Management, said the company intends to make the regional expertise accumulated through its own portfolio available to investment partners. The strategy will focus not only on acquiring properties but also on managing and improving them throughout the investment period.

The expansion gives UNIQA Real Estate a new source of capital beyond the insurance group’s own property allocations. It also positions the company more directly within the institutional real estate investment-management market, where international investors increasingly use local or regional operating platforms to access individual European markets.

UNIQA Group has operations in 14 countries and serves more than 18 million customers. Its established network across Central and Eastern Europe provides the real estate division with local market infrastructure that can now also be used for investments backed by external capital.

The change represents a significant development for UNIQA Real Estate’s business model. Rather than remaining primarily an internal property manager for an insurance group, the company is positioning its €3 billion platform as an investment partner for institutional capital seeking exposure to Austria and CEE.

Norblin Factory Reaches Full Occupancy Five Years After Reopening

Five years after reopening, Norblin Factory has developed into a fully occupied mixed-use destination in Warsaw, combining offices with restaurants, retail, services, entertainment and cultural facilities. The Capital Park development now attracts around 500,000 visitors each month, while more than 3,000 people work at the complex.

Capital Park acquired the former industrial site on Żelazna Street in 2008. The following years were devoted to design, planning procedures and conservation arrangements before construction started in November 2017. After 46 months of redevelopment, Norblin Factory reopened in September 2021, completing a 13-year process from acquisition to operation.

The complex provides more than 41,000 sqm of office space alongside almost 24,000 sqm devoted to other commercial and cultural uses. Its offices were fully leased before construction was completed, with occupiers including Allegro, Japan Tobacco International, ISS and SEB Bank. Puzzle Office and Beyond Office provide flexible workspace within the development.

Leasing the remaining areas took longer, particularly as the final stage of construction coincided with the Covid-19 pandemic and disruption across the retail and hospitality markets. Capital Park subsequently continued developing the tenant mix, and the non-office component has now also reached full occupancy.

Food and beverage has become one of the property’s largest uses outside the offices, occupying almost 10,000 sqm across 38 concepts. Food Town covers approximately 3,200 sqm in five historic halls and accommodates 24 food operators and five bars. The wider offer includes Piano Bar and the 1,400 sqm MOXO restaurant and music venue.

Entertainment and leisure uses have further broadened the property’s role. KinoGram and its event facilities occupy around 3,500 sqm, while BioBazar covers approximately 2,000 sqm. Smart Kids Planet operates across 1,600 sqm and Art Box Experience has around 800 sqm. More than 2,000 sqm is also occupied by health and beauty businesses.

The industrial history of the site remains integrated into the development. The Norblin Factory Museum incorporates 10 historic buildings and almost 50 pieces of former manufacturing machinery and equipment, together with a collection of more than 400 silver-plated objects connected with production at the former factory.

Cultural programming has also become a regular part of the property’s operation. Since 2021, 240 Wednesday Jam Sessions have been organised, while the Summer Stage has hosted more than 470 music and DJ performances since its introduction in 2022. Other activities include theatre, concerts, dance events and programmes for families.

Five years of operation have demonstrated the management challenges associated with combining offices, restaurants, retail, entertainment and cultural facilities within a single development. Each use has different operating hours, servicing requirements and visitor patterns, requiring more active coordination than a conventional single-use commercial property.

With both its office and non-office components now fully occupied, Norblin Factory has moved beyond the initial redevelopment and leasing stages. Its next phase will depend increasingly on the management of its different functions, tenant performance and its ability to maintain visitor activity throughout the working week and weekends.

Greek Economy Maintains Growth in H1 2026 as Employment Strengthens

Greece maintained its economic expansion during the first half of 2026, supported by improving employment, industrial activity, tourism and continued investment. Growth remained relatively steady despite weaker conditions across parts of Europe, although rising inflation emerged as a more significant challenge for households and businesses towards the end of the period. The economy expanded by 0.3% during the second quarter compared with the first three months of the year and was 1.9% larger than in Q2 2025. This followed continued expansion during the opening quarter, leaving Greece with positive growth through the first six months of 2026.

Investment remained an important part of the economic picture, supported by European funding, infrastructure programmes and private-sector projects. Greece continues to deploy substantial resources through EU-backed programmes, although the contribution from these funds is expected to become less significant as the current funding cycle approaches completion. Consumer demand also continued to support economic activity, but the improvement was relatively modest. Household finances benefited from stronger employment, while renewed increases in living costs, particularly those associated with housing and energy, placed additional pressure on purchasing power.

Industrial activity provided another positive element during the first half. Production increased by 1.1% year-on-year in June, while output across January to June was 3.3% higher than during the corresponding period of 2025. The increase provided an additional source of economic activity alongside Greece’s larger services and tourism sectors. Retail activity also remained positive, with inflation-adjusted retail sales 1.9% higher in June than a year earlier, although sales volumes declined compared with May after seasonal adjustment. This suggests that consumer activity continued to expand on an annual basis while showing some loss of momentum towards the end of H1.

The labour market recorded further improvement. During the second quarter, employment increased compared with the same period of 2025, while the number of unemployed people declined. The quarterly unemployment rate fell to 7.9%, compared with 8.6% in Q2 2025. Monthly figures similarly showed unemployment declining towards the end of the first half, with the seasonally adjusted rate standing at around 8% in June, substantially below its level a year earlier. The continued improvement represents an important structural change for an economy that experienced exceptionally high unemployment during the decade following the sovereign debt crisis. The tighter labour market is also creating new challenges, with employers in sectors including tourism and construction increasingly facing difficulties finding workers.

Inflation became one of the principal economic concerns during H1. Consumer prices were 4.4% higher in June than a year earlier, compared with annual inflation of 2.8% in June 2025. Housing-related expenses were among the areas experiencing particularly strong price increases. The category covering housing, water, electricity, gas and other household fuels increased by 10.6% year-on-year in June, while food and non-alcoholic beverages were 2.7% more expensive. Higher accommodation and energy costs are particularly relevant for the property market. Improving employment supports housing demand, but rising rents, utilities and other household expenses can simultaneously increase affordability pressures, particularly in Athens and locations experiencing strong tourism and residential demand.

International trade presented a mixed picture. During the second quarter, exports of goods and services increased by 2.2% year-on-year in real terms, while imports grew by 3.7%. Goods exports performed more strongly, increasing by 6.6%, while exports of services declined by 1.7%. The difference between export and import growth illustrates one of the continuing characteristics of the Greek economy. Stronger domestic demand and investment generate additional imports, leaving the country exposed to movements in international energy and commodity prices even as export capacity improves.

Tourism remained an important source of economic activity as the summer season gathered momentum. In June, Greek hotels, campsites and other short-stay accommodation establishments recorded approximately 5.58 million arrivals and 24.06 million overnight stays. Arrivals increased by 1.3% compared with June 2025, while overnight stays were 1.4% higher. International visitors remained responsible for the majority of tourism activity, accounting for around 82% of arrivals and almost 90% of overnight stays during June. The relatively moderate increase in visitor numbers also points towards a changing tourism investment story, with future growth in hotel revenues and property values likely to depend increasingly on accommodation quality, pricing, season extension and visitor spending rather than simply continued rapid increases in arrivals.

Greece’s economic outlook remains positive, although higher inflation has made the environment more complicated. The European Commission expects GDP to increase by approximately 1.8% across 2026 following growth of 2.1% during 2025, before moderating to around 1.6% in 2027. Inflation is expected to average approximately 3.7% during 2026 as higher energy costs continue to affect households and businesses. Investment supported by European funding is expected to remain an important contributor to economic activity during the year.

Greece’s public finances have also improved substantially compared with the conditions that defined the country during the sovereign debt crisis. The European Commission expects the general government balance to remain positive during 2026, with a surplus of approximately 0.8% of GDP. Public debt remains high but continues to decline relative to the size of the economy, with the Commission expecting the debt ratio to fall from approximately 146.1% of GDP in 2025 to 140.7% in 2026 and around 134.4% in 2027.

For Greece’s commercial property sector, the first-half economic picture remains broadly supportive. Improving employment can strengthen occupier and consumer demand, continued tourism activity supports hotels and hospitality property, and higher industrial production provides a more favourable environment for logistics and manufacturing-related facilities. There are nevertheless significant constraints. Higher inflation is reducing some of the benefit households receive from stronger employment, while rising energy and accommodation costs are increasing pressure on consumers. Development economics also remain sensitive to construction, financing and operating costs.

Greece entered the second half of 2026 with economic growth intact, unemployment continuing to decline and industrial and tourism activity providing support. At the same time, inflation has returned as a more prominent challenge and the economy remains exposed to external energy costs and international economic conditions. The longer-term question is whether Greece can maintain its current growth rate as the contribution from European recovery funding gradually diminishes. Sustained private investment, higher productivity and continued expansion of the country’s productive economy will become increasingly important if the improvement recorded during recent years is to continue beyond the present investment cycle.

Source: CIJ.World Research & Analysis Team

Industrial Growth Is Making Development-Ready Land a Strategic Gulf Asset

The Gulf’s industrial property expansion is beginning to move beyond a simple question of warehouse availability. Strong occupier demand continues to support logistics markets in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, but the next stage of development may depend increasingly on something more fundamental: how much land can actually accommodate new industrial activity within a commercially useful timeframe. This distinction matters because the Gulf does not suffer from a physical shortage of land. The constraint is much narrower. Manufacturers and logistics companies need sites where they can secure approvals, connect to sufficient electricity and other utilities, move freight efficiently and begin construction without waiting years for surrounding infrastructure. Land meeting all of those conditions is considerably less abundant than undeveloped territory.

Saudi Arabia demonstrates the issue particularly clearly. Riyadh, Jeddah and the Dammam metropolitan area entered the second half of 2026 with industrial and logistics occupancy above 90%. Modern facilities remained difficult to secure in several established locations, helping maintain upward pressure on rents. These conditions are encouraging additional development, but constructing more buildings alone may not resolve the imbalance. New supply first requires appropriate sites, and those sites need infrastructure capable of supporting the businesses expected to occupy them.

Riyadh presents perhaps the most obvious example. The capital’s expanding population and economy are increasing the volume of goods moving through the metropolitan area, while manufacturing and localisation policies are adding another source of industrial demand. Companies serving this market need distribution facilities positioned so that trucks can reach customers efficiently rather than simply inexpensive plots somewhere outside the city. That gives established industrial corridors an important advantage. Their value derives not only from location but from the infrastructure and commercial ecosystem that have developed around them. Roads, utilities, neighbouring businesses, labour accessibility and established industrial permissions can significantly reduce the time required to bring new facilities into operation.

Jeddah has a different advantage. Its large metropolitan economy is combined with access to one of Saudi Arabia’s principal Red Sea gateways. For importers, manufacturers and distributors, the ability to connect maritime trade with western Saudi consumption makes appropriately located industrial sites particularly valuable. Saudi Arabia’s ambition to expand domestic production makes the question more important. By Q2 2026, the Kingdom had approximately 13,600 industrial establishments. Further manufacturing growth will require considerably more than conventional storage buildings. Factories can need substantial electricity, water, specialist infrastructure, environmental approvals and access suitable for heavy vehicles. Some industries also require specific separation distances or planning conditions. The number of locations capable of satisfying all these requirements can therefore be significantly smaller than the amount of nominal industrial land.

This is where industrial property begins to resemble infrastructure investment. A developer acquiring residential land primarily considers planning, construction costs, market demand and sales or rental values. Industrial developers must consider those factors alongside power capacity, freight movements, utility networks and the technical requirements of prospective occupiers. A failure in any one of these areas can undermine the commercial value of an otherwise well-positioned site.

The UAE shows how valuable an established industrial ecosystem can become. Dubai has spent decades building connections between ports, airports, roads, free zones, warehouses and international trading businesses. Jebel Ali sits at the centre of that network, creating an industrial and logistics environment whose value extends well beyond individual buildings. Dubai South adds another dimension by combining logistics, aviation-related infrastructure and substantial development capacity. Together, these locations demonstrate that industrial competitiveness depends not merely on providing plots but on creating networks through which businesses can move goods, employees and capital efficiently. This helps explain why modern industrial accommodation in Dubai continues to attract strong demand. During Q2 2026, industrial rents remained higher than a year earlier despite continued development activity. The market therefore still provides evidence that occupiers are competing for suitable space in established locations.

Abu Dhabi is developing through a somewhat different mechanism. Its industrial expansion is closely connected to efforts to increase manufacturing and diversify economic activity. Government-backed programmes encouraging domestic production, investment and industrial development can generate property requirements extending from factories to warehouses, offices and employee accommodation. For investors, manufacturing demand can be particularly attractive because production facilities are often more difficult to relocate than ordinary storage operations. A company that has installed machinery, secured specialist utility connections and integrated itself into a local supply chain has greater physical commitment to a location than an occupier using a relatively standard distribution warehouse.

This can encourage industrial clustering. A major manufacturer creates demand from suppliers, maintenance businesses, transport companies and other service providers. Those companies then create additional demand for nearby industrial property, strengthening the economic importance of the wider district. Control of development-ready land consequently becomes strategically important. Across the Gulf, substantial industrial territory is managed through economic zones, port authorities and government-backed development organisations. The speed at which new supply can emerge therefore depends partly on infrastructure programmes and land-allocation decisions rather than property prices alone.

This can make the response to rising rents slower than it initially appears. Higher warehouse rents create an incentive to build, but new projects still require suitable sites and infrastructure. Electricity networks may need reinforcement, roads may require expansion and planning permissions must correspond with the intended industrial activity. Power deserves particular attention as the Gulf attempts to attract more sophisticated manufacturing. Conventional warehouses generally have relatively straightforward electricity requirements. Automated distribution, temperature-controlled facilities and advanced manufacturing can require significantly greater capacity. Some industrial operations may therefore select locations partly according to the certainty and scale of the power connection available.

This could gradually influence industrial land values. Two apparently similar plots may have very different development potential if one can support an energy-intensive occupier immediately while the other requires substantial network investment before construction becomes commercially viable. Road and port access create similar differences. Being geographically close to a port does not necessarily make a site an efficient logistics location. Freight must be able to move between the port, warehouse, factory and customer without excessive congestion or operational restrictions.

These considerations broaden the Gulf industrial investment story beyond Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Oman offers a substantially different proposition. Rather than competing primarily through scarcity, the country has the potential to use the availability of industrial territory connected to strategically located ports. Sohar, Salalah and Duqm provide different combinations of maritime access, industrial development and space for expansion. For certain manufacturers, this can be compelling. Businesses focused on international supply chains may place greater value on shipping access, operating costs and room for future expansion than on being located immediately beside the Gulf’s largest metropolitan populations.

Oman’s challenge is ensuring that available land translates into commercially competitive industrial capacity. A large plot has limited significance if utility connections, transport infrastructure or operating procedures prevent a company from using it efficiently. The investment case therefore depends on the quality of infrastructure surrounding the land rather than its quantity alone. Bahrain represents almost the opposite situation. Its limited geographic size restricts the amount of land available for industrial expansion, but its position provides manufacturers and distributors with access to the much larger Saudi economy. Established industrial areas can combine serviced sites with proximity to port infrastructure, the airport and the road connection into Saudi Arabia. For occupiers serving both Bahrain and eastern Saudi Arabia, that can compensate for the country’s relatively small domestic market.

The comparison reveals that Gulf cities are increasingly competing through different industrial advantages. Riyadh offers access to Saudi Arabia’s largest urban economy. Jeddah combines a major consumer market with Red Sea trade. Dubai provides an established international logistics network. Abu Dhabi links industrial property with a broader manufacturing strategy. Oman can offer port-related expansion capacity, while Bahrain provides a compact base with direct access towards Saudi Arabia. This diversity matters to institutional investors because industrial assets should increasingly be assessed according to the infrastructure supporting them rather than warehouse specifications alone.

An existing logistics estate with additional serviced land may, for example, have greater long-term potential than a fully developed property with no room for expansion. If demand strengthens, the first asset can potentially add buildings without repeating the entire land-acquisition and infrastructure process. Older industrial estates could also become increasingly interesting. Buildings can become obsolete while the infrastructure underneath them retains considerable value. A dated warehouse occupying a well-connected industrial site may therefore offer redevelopment potential that is not obvious from its existing rental income.

This creates an important distinction between scarcity of buildings and scarcity of development capacity. High warehouse rents eventually encourage developers to construct more space. Increasing the supply of properly zoned industrial sites with sufficient infrastructure generally takes much longer. Governments across the Gulf have the financial capacity to change that equation. New economic zones, roads, ports and utility networks can create industrial locations where none previously existed. Investors should therefore avoid assuming that today’s scarcity will automatically persist for a decade.

The more important question is where infrastructure investment will arrive next and whether it will create viable alternatives to today’s established industrial districts. That makes industrial land analysis increasingly forward-looking. Investors need to understand not only current rents and occupancy but planned road connections, port expansion, utility capacity, economic-zone development and manufacturing policy. These factors can determine where future industrial demand can physically be accommodated.

The regional logistics market is therefore entering a more complex phase. Saudi Arabia and the UAE continue to demonstrate strong demand for modern facilities, while Oman and Bahrain provide alternative industrial propositions within the wider Gulf economy. At the same time, manufacturing ambitions are increasing the technical requirements placed on industrial locations. For property investors, the implications are significant. The most strategically valuable industrial sites may increasingly be those where companies can expand without waiting for infrastructure to catch up.

Warehouse rents will remain an important measure of current market strength. But over the longer term, another set of questions could matter more: who controls the land, what can legally be built there, how much power is available, how quickly goods can reach a port or motorway, and when a new occupier can realistically begin operating. As Gulf economies build larger manufacturing and logistics sectors, the answers to those questions will increasingly determine where industrial property value is created. The next major opportunity may therefore lie beneath the warehouse itself: in the connected, permitted and operationally usable land on which the region’s industrial expansion depends.

Source: CIJ.World Research & Analysis Team

Belgrade Office Vacancy Hits 4.5% as Leasing Activity Slows

Belgrade’s office market is sending two apparently conflicting signals. Modern buildings have very little available space and prime rents continue to rise, yet companies signed considerably less office space during the second quarter of 2026 than they did a year earlier. Office take-up reached approximately 33,400 sqm during Q2, reflecting a quieter leasing period compared with the same quarter of 2025. At the same time, the citywide vacancy rate stood at only around 4.5%, leaving occupiers with relatively few immediate choices when searching for alternative premises.

Part of the explanation lies on the supply side. Only about 6,000 sqm of new office space was completed during Q2, meaning there was little fresh stock available to accommodate companies considering relocations or expansion. In a market where existing modern buildings are already highly occupied, limited new construction can restrict leasing activity even when companies remain interested in moving. Lease renewals have consequently become an important part of the market. For companies already occupying good-quality offices, extending an existing agreement can be more practical than searching for another building offering the right combination of location, specification, size and price.

This means low vacancy and relatively weak leasing activity do not necessarily contradict each other. They may, in part, be different consequences of the same shortage of suitable space. The situation is particularly important in Belgrade’s better office locations, where modern buildings continue to attract occupier attention. Companies are increasingly selective about workplace quality, efficiency and accessibility, making headline citywide vacancy less useful as a measure of how much genuinely desirable office space is available.

This preference is creating a widening distinction between newer offices and older buildings. Prime properties can benefit from limited availability and stronger tenant demand, while ageing stock faces a different challenge. A building may technically provide vacant space without necessarily meeting the standards companies now expect from their workplaces. Prime rents have responded to these conditions, reaching approximately €19 per sqm per month. Rising rents alongside subdued leasing provide another indication that scarcity rather than rapidly expanding occupier requirements is influencing the market.

However, Belgrade is approaching a significant supply test. Approximately 139,000 sqm of office space was under construction during Q2, representing a substantial addition compared with the limited amount delivered during the quarter. Close to 60% of this pipeline is concentrated in the CBD, where available space remains particularly scarce. As these projects are completed, the market should gain a clearer picture of underlying occupier demand.

If new Grade A buildings lease quickly, it would suggest that current take-up figures have been constrained partly by a shortage of appropriate space. If absorption proves slower, the new supply could instead reveal that companies have become more cautious about expanding their office footprints. Hybrid working is likely to form part of that discussion, but it should not be treated as the sole explanation. Greater flexibility, more efficient layouts, economic uncertainty and tighter control of occupancy costs can all influence corporate requirements.

At the same time, companies that reduce their overall footprint can still demand better offices. A business moving from a larger older property into a smaller modern building may occupy fewer square metres while increasing the quality of its workplace. Such behaviour would strengthen demand for prime buildings without necessarily producing large increases in overall leasing volumes.

This creates an important challenge for owners of secondary offices. As new projects increase the amount of modern space available, older buildings may have to compete through refurbishment, more flexible leasing arrangements or lower rents. The current 4.5% citywide vacancy rate therefore hides potentially significant differences between individual properties and locations.

For developers, the timing of the pipeline will be equally important. Belgrade currently has enough scarcity to support prime rents, but the arrival of approximately 139,000 sqm of space currently under construction could alter the balance between landlords and occupiers. How quickly that space is absorbed will determine whether today’s shortage persists or begins to ease.

Belgrade’s office market is therefore not simply experiencing weak leasing or strong occupancy. Both conditions exist simultaneously. The city has very little immediately available modern office space, while companies are becoming increasingly selective about when, where and how much space they lease. The next wave of office completions should provide the clearest indication yet of what is driving the market. If occupiers move rapidly into the new projects, Belgrade’s subdued leasing figures may prove to have been largely a consequence of insufficient supply. If they do not, the city could discover that exceptionally low vacancy has been concealing a deeper change in corporate demand.

Source: CIJ.World Research & Analysis Team

front page info
LATEST NEWS