China introduces first comprehensive rules to protect industrial and supply chains

21 April 2026

China has adopted its first dedicated legal framework aimed at safeguarding industrial and supply chain security, as geopolitical tensions and trade disruptions continue to shape global markets.

The new Provisions on Industrial and Supply Chain Security, issued by the State Council of the People’s Republic of China on 31 March 2026, took immediate effect. They establish a broad legal structure designed to strengthen resilience, manage risks and enable countermeasures against external pressures affecting China’s economic and industrial systems.

The regulation applies across both “industrial chains” and “supply chains”, treating them as complementary concepts. While the industrial chain covers the full lifecycle of a product, from research and raw materials through to manufacturing and sales, the supply chain focuses more narrowly on sourcing, logistics and inputs. In practice, the rules aim to protect the entire ecosystem rather than individual segments.

A key element of the framework is its focus on so-called “critical sectors”. Government authorities are expected to publish and regularly update a list of industries considered strategically important, although this has not yet been released. The scope of that list will determine how widely the rules apply in practice.

The provisions also extend beyond China’s borders. They allow authorities to take action against foreign governments, companies or individuals whose activities are deemed to harm China’s supply chain security, signalling an increasingly assertive regulatory stance.

Before this legislation, China relied on a range of separate laws to address external economic pressures, including the Foreign Relations Law of the People’s Republic of China, the Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law of the People’s Republic of China and export control rules. However, these were largely reactive or targeted at specific issues. The new provisions introduce a more coordinated, system-wide approach.

On the preventive side, the framework sets out mechanisms to improve supply chain resilience. These include the creation of information-sharing platforms, a national risk monitoring and early-warning system, and requirements for authorities to build strategic reserves in key sectors. Companies and industry groups are encouraged to report risks, while both central and local governments are empowered to introduce tailored mitigation measures.

The rules also emphasise technological self-sufficiency, encouraging investment in research and development while requiring companies and institutions to maintain control over critical technologies, data and systems.

Alongside these measures, the provisions introduce a set of investigative and enforcement tools. Authorities may intervene in cases where supply disruptions threaten national or economic security, including through direct involvement in production, logistics or distribution if approved at state level.

The regulation also outlines potential countermeasures against foreign actors. These range from trade restrictions and additional fees imposed at state level, to targeted actions against individual companies or persons. In more severe cases, entities could face limits on market access, investment, operations or even entry into China.

Notably, the rules allow enforcement to extend beyond directly affected entities to affiliated companies, regardless of ownership thresholds. This “look-through” approach increases potential exposure for multinational groups operating in or with China.

At the same time, the provisions create possible conflicts for international businesses. Companies complying with foreign sanctions or export controls may find those same actions interpreted as discriminatory or harmful under Chinese law, potentially triggering penalties.

Entities operating within China, including foreign-invested firms, are also required to comply with any countermeasures imposed. Failure to do so could result in restrictions on trade, data transfers, public procurement participation or even residency rights.

Overall, the new framework marks a shift towards a more proactive and centralised approach to managing supply chain risks. For companies with exposure to China, it introduces additional compliance considerations and highlights the need for closer monitoring of regulatory developments, particularly once the list of critical sectors is published.

Source: CMS

LATEST NEWS