Sunday, 26 October 2025
Poland’s financial ambitions are growing bolder. The head of the Warsaw Stock Exchange (WSE), Tomasz Bardziłowski, says he wants the country’s capital market recognised among the world’s most advanced within the next three to five years. The goal: to persuade index provider MSCI to promote Poland from “emerging” to “developed” market status — a change that would mark a major milestone for Central Europe’s largest economy.
For now, the aspiration remains just that — a long-term target rather than a near-term expectation. While Poland’s economic fundamentals already resemble those of Western Europe, the structure of its financial market still falls short of the standards MSCI requires.
Few doubt that Poland qualifies as an advanced economy by traditional metrics. It is now among the EU’s top-performing members in growth, with stable public finances and rising household incomes. Its GDP per capita, measured by purchasing power, rivals that of Portugal or Greece. In everyday economic terms, Poland already looks “developed.”
Yet MSCI’s criteria extend beyond output and income. The index group examines how well a financial market operates — from liquidity and trading depth to investor access and regulatory transparency. On those counts, Warsaw remains a work in progress.
The exchange’s capitalisation has surpassed €250 billion, making it the largest in the region. But trading remains uneven: activity is concentrated in a small number of major companies, leaving hundreds of smaller listings thinly traded. Average daily volumes remain modest by international standards, and the number of firms large enough to meet MSCI’s size and liquidity benchmarks is limited.
Poland has made steady progress in opening its market to global investors, but certain practical barriers persist. Some companies still lack comprehensive English-language reporting, and international funds face administrative hurdles when registering holdings or exercising shareholder rights. The limited scope for share-lending and short-selling also restricts foreign institutional participation — a key test for MSCI when judging whether a market can absorb and manage large cross-border capital flows.
These weaknesses mean that while Poland’s economy functions like a developed one, its stock market still behaves like an emerging market. The same pattern has kept other advanced economies, such as South Korea, from securing the “developed” label from MSCI despite their technological and industrial strength.
Bardziłowski and other financial officials argue that new reforms could help close the gap. The government’s OKI investment account scheme — allowing individuals to invest up to PLN 100,000 tax-free — aims to deepen the domestic investor base and broaden liquidity. Financial authorities are also pushing companies to adopt clearer disclosure standards and streamline settlement systems.
The Warsaw Stock Exchange has already been recognised as a “developed market” by another major index provider, FTSE Russell, which made the upgrade in 2018. That decision reflected confidence in Poland’s regulatory and economic stability, even if liquidity and access still lag behind peers.
Not everyone shares the WSE’s optimism. Economists caution that building a truly self-sustaining capital market takes time. They note that when global shocks strike, Polish equities tend to move in step with emerging-market peers — a sign of continued dependence on foreign capital rather than domestic savings.
Analysts warn that sustained progress will require several years of consistent liquidity growth and continued reform, not simply an improved headline economy. In other words, Poland’s challenge is no longer macroeconomic but institutional: ensuring that the mechanics of trading, clearing and disclosure match those of Western Europe’s mature exchanges.
If achieved, Poland’s reclassification would be historic. It would make the WSE the first market in post-communist Europe to reach developed-market status under MSCI’s methodology — a symbolic leap for a country that, within a generation, has transformed from a command economy into a key EU financial hub.
For investors, such an upgrade would likely channel billions of euros in passive inflows through exchange-traded funds and global portfolios benchmarked to developed-market indices. For Poland, it would affirm its role as the financial anchor of Central Europe.
But for now, the road ahead looks long. MSCI typically waits for structural reforms to take hold across several review cycles before adjusting its classifications. Even countries with larger markets — such as South Korea and Taiwan — have been waiting for years.
The Warsaw Stock Exchange’s goal is therefore best seen as part of a gradual evolution rather than a quick leap. With reforms under way, liquidity expanding, and domestic investment growing, Poland may well strengthen its claim by the end of the decade.
Whether MSCI’s verdict comes in three years or in ten, the effort itself underscores how far the country has come since its market opened three decades ago. From the first privatizations in the 1990s to today’s global aspirations, Warsaw’s exchange has become both a symbol and a driver of Poland’s transformation — one still writing the next chapter of its economic story.
Editorial Disclaimer: This publication is for general informational purposes only. CIJ.World verifies factual accuracy at the time of writing and maintains editorial neutrality regarding market forecasts or investment outcomes.
